Lula’s Role in Saving the Amazon


The Amazon rainforest is the largest rainforest in the world, and it is under threat due to deforestation in Brazil. The current Brazilian government under President Jair Bolsonaro has been criticized for its lack of action on deforestation, which has surged to a 15-year high. However, when former President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva returned to power in January, he promised to end deforestation in the Amazon rainforest.

Lula’s announcement came with plans to renew the Amazon Cooperation Treaty Organization, which aims to promote the sustainable development of the Amazon Basin. But is political will enough to end deforestation? And what are the implications of the destruction of the Amazon?

To discuss these questions, Sami Zeidan hosts a panel of experts on his show. Karla Mendes, an investigative journalist at Mongabay, explains that deforestation in Brazil is driven by a complex set of factors, including illegal logging, land grabbing, and cattle ranching. She notes that the government’s lack of enforcement of environmental laws has contributed to the problem.

Ana Carolina Alfinito, a legal adviser at Amazon Watch, agrees that enforcement is a key issue. She notes that the Brazilian government has weakened environmental protections and reduced funding for enforcement agencies. She also points out that indigenous communities in the Amazon are particularly vulnerable to the impacts of deforestation, as their livelihoods and cultures are closely tied to the forest.

Michael Jacobs, a professor of political economy at Sheffield University, adds that there are also global implications of deforestation in the Amazon. The rainforest plays a crucial role in regulating the Earth’s climate, as it absorbs carbon dioxide from the atmosphere. Deforestation releases this carbon back into the atmosphere, contributing to climate change. Jacobs notes that this is a problem for all countries, not just Brazil.

The panel agrees that political will alone is not enough to end deforestation in the Amazon. Mendes argues that there needs to be a shift in the economic incentives that drive deforestation, such as subsidies for cattle ranching and soybean production. Alfinito adds that there needs to be greater recognition of the rights of indigenous communities, who are often marginalized in decision-making processes.

Jacobs suggests that international pressure can also play a role in addressing deforestation in the Amazon. He notes that some companies have committed to zero-deforestation policies, and that consumers can use their purchasing power to support these companies. He also suggests that countries could use trade agreements to incentivize sustainable practices.

The panel concludes that ending deforestation in the Amazon will require a multi-faceted approach that addresses the economic, social, and environmental factors driving the problem. While political will is important, it must be backed up by concrete actions and policies. The implications of deforestation in the Amazon are global, and all countries have a stake in finding solutions to this pressing issue.