The International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) has emphasized its neutrality in the Israel-Hamas conflict, stating that criticism is hindering its operations. The organization, which was established 160 years ago to act as a neutral intermediary in conflicts and provide assistance to prisoners of war, has faced accusations from both sides of not adequately helping hostages. ICRC President Mirjana Spoljaric expressed concern about the increasing pressure and stated that abandoning neutrality and resorting to public denunciations would render the organization irrelevant.
Spoljaric’s remarks came after her visit to Israel, the occupied West Bank, and Gaza. During her visit, she met with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who urged her to exert public pressure on Hamas. However, Spoljaric argued that public denouncements have proven ineffective and only expose the organization to constant criticism. She also highlighted the dangers faced by ICRC staff on the ground due to the high levels of media attention and social media campaigns.
Spoljaric drew attention to a recent attack on an ICRC humanitarian convoy in Khartoum, Sudan, which aimed to evacuate over 100 vulnerable civilians. She emphasized the connection between what happens in Sudan and Gaza, stating that renouncing neutrality in one context would undermine the organization’s ability to operate successfully. Neutrality and confidentiality are crucial for the ICRC’s work.
The ICRC president’s visit to the region followed the outbreak of the bloodiest-ever Gaza war, initiated by Hamas on October 7. According to Israeli figures, around 1,140 people, mostly civilians, were killed by militants in Israel, and approximately 250 were abducted. Gaza’s Hamas-run health ministry reported that Israel’s military response resulted in the deaths of over 19,660 people, predominantly women and children. As part of a truce at the end of November, around 100 hostages were released, with the ICRC facilitating their transportation. However, instead of being praised for its role in the hostage release, the ICRC faced criticism on social media, with some referring to it as a “glorified taxi service” or “Uber.” Spoljaric condemned these comparisons as unacceptable and outrageous.
Spoljaric revealed that talks to release more hostages and Palestinian prisoners had resumed in Doha. Although the ICRC is not directly involved in the negotiations, it serves as a neutral intermediary. She emphasized that the ICRC’s conversations with Hamas and Israeli authorities are ongoing and detailed.
In addition to addressing the challenges faced in the Israel-Hamas conflict, Spoljaric warned of a potential liquidity crisis within the ICRC. Despite support from donor countries, the organization’s business model, which involves immediate response to crises, has led to an increase in demand. This demand has put a strain on the ICRC’s resources and necessitates a reassessment of staffing levels.
The ICRC’s commitment to neutrality and confidentiality is essential for its operations in conflict zones. Spoljaric’s visit to the region highlighted the challenges faced by the organization in the Israel-Hamas conflict and emphasized the need for public understanding and support. As an impartial humanitarian organization, the ICRC plays a critical role in facilitating negotiations and providing assistance to those affected by conflicts.