In a significant political development, Sudan’s paramilitary Rapid Support Forces (RSF) have taken a bold step towards establishing a parallel government by signing a constitution in Nairobi. This move, which comes after nearly two years of devastating conflict between the RSF and the regular army, has raised eyebrows both regionally and internationally. The signing of the constitutional document was confirmed by Ahmed Tuqud Lisan, a member of the Sudan Founding Alliance’s preparatory committee, who stated that all parties involved in the founding charter participated in the event.
The ongoing war in Sudan has resulted in catastrophic humanitarian consequences, displacing over 12 million people and leading to what the United Nations has termed the world’s worst hunger and displacement crises. The RSF’s recent charter, signed just last week, promises to establish a “government of peace and unity” in areas under rebel control. This ambitious plan aims to address the urgent needs of the population and restore some semblance of governance in the war-torn regions.
The newly signed transitional constitution outlines the tasks for the transitional period, a decentralized governing system, and the structures of the executive authority. This document is a critical step towards formalizing the RSF’s governance framework and establishing a functioning government, which is expected to be announced within Sudan soon. The implications of this development are profound, as it could potentially alter the power dynamics within the country.
However, the situation is fraught with tension. Kenya, which hosted the signing, has faced criticism for its role in facilitating the RSF’s activities. The Sudanese army-aligned government has expressed its discontent by recalling its ambassador from Nairobi, accusing Kenyan President William Ruto of prioritizing personal and commercial interests over regional stability. This diplomatic fallout underscores the complexities of the situation, as various regional players navigate their interests amidst the chaos.
The RSF’s constitution was signed by 24 representatives, including Abdel Rahim Dagalo, the RSF’s deputy. This coalition of political and military partners signifies a concerted effort to consolidate power and provide governance in regions where the regular army’s influence is waning. The war has effectively divided Sudan, with the army controlling the north and east, while the RSF dominates the western region of Darfur and significant portions of the south.
As the RSF moves forward with its plans, the international community watches closely. The potential for a parallel government raises questions about legitimacy, governance, and the future of peace in Sudan. Experts warn that without a comprehensive peace agreement involving all stakeholders, including the regular army and various political factions, the prospect of lasting stability remains uncertain.
In light of these developments, it is crucial for observers and policymakers to consider the broader implications of the RSF’s actions. The humanitarian crisis continues to escalate, and any attempts at governance must prioritize the needs of the displaced and suffering population. Engaging with local communities and fostering dialogue among conflicting parties will be essential in any path towards peace.
The situation in Sudan serves as a stark reminder of the fragility of governance in conflict zones. As the RSF prepares to announce its government, the world must remain vigilant, advocating for a resolution that prioritizes human rights and the well-being of the Sudanese people. The coming weeks will be pivotal in determining whether this new political landscape will lead to meaningful change or further entrench the divisions that have plagued the country for far too long.