Saudi Arabia abolishes flogging as punishment: Supreme Court docket

Saudi Arabia abolishes flogging as punishment: Supreme Court docket


Saudi Arabia has abolished flogging as a kind of punishment, the country’s supreme court has introduced.

The court docket mentioned on Saturday that thehuman legal rights advancements” are part of reforms pushed by King Salman Bin Abdul Aziz and his son, the kingdom’s de facto ruler, Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman (MBS).

A lot more:

  • Saudi activists dispute formal narrative on al-Hwaiti killing

  • Amnesty: Saudi Arabia executed report quantity of persons in 2019

  • Rights groups: Popular Saudi rights activist dies in custody

Court-requested floggings in Saudi Arabia – at times extending to hundreds of lashes – have long drawn condemnation from human rights groups.

Human rights activists, however, say authorized reforms overseen by MBS have brought no enable-up in the conservative kingdom’s crushing of dissent, which includes via the use of the loss of life penalty.

Global human legal rights norms

The Saudi supreme courtroom claimed the most up-to-date reform was meant to “bring the kingdom into line with worldwide human rights norms versus corporal punishment”.

Previously the courts could buy the flogging of convicts located guilty of offences ranging from extramarital sexual intercourse and breach of the peace to murder.

In long term, judges will have to choose in between fines and/or jail sentences, or non-custodial alternatives like local community support, the court claimed in a statement seen by AFP on Saturday.

The most large-profile instance of flogging in modern several years was the situation of Saudi blogger Raif Badawi, who was arrested in 2012 and sentenced to 7 yrs in jail and 600 lashes and then resentenced to ten a long time and one,000 lashes in 2014 for blogging about totally free speech and “insulting Islam”.

He was awarded the European Parliament’s Sakharov human legal rights prize the subsequent 12 months. Badawi is presently serving his jail term.

Saudi Arabia’s human rights history has come less than scrutiny this 7 days subsequent information of the death in prison of human legal rights activist and lawyer Abdullah al-Hamid.

The sixty nine-year-previous was a founding member of the Saudi Civil and Political Rights Affiliation, known by its Arabic acronym HASEM, and was sentenced to 11 several years in jail in March 2013, campaigners reported.

He was convicted on several rates, including “breaking allegiance” to the Saudi ruler, “inciting condition” and looking for to disrupt point out stability, Amnesty Global stated.

Criticism of Saudi Arabia’s human legal rights history has developed considering that King Salman named his son Prince Mohammed as crown prince and heir to the throne in June 2017.

‘Disingenuous move’

Aliaa Abutayah, a London-centered Saudi political activist and an opposition chief, instructed Al Jazeera the hottest transform by the Saudi governing administration in its penal code is a “incredibly compact alter”.

“If the Saudi governing administration is significant about legal reform, they need to start by releasing all of the political and human legal rights prisoners they have been keeping in their prisons for yrs,”she reported.

“The authorities should really also abolish the demise penalty, such as the practice of executing juveniles,” she extra.

The October 2018 murder of critic Jamal Khashoggi inside of the Saudi consulate in Istanbul and the improved repression of dissidents at residence have overshadowed the prince’s pledge to modernise the economy and culture.