Thursday, September 7, 2023

Russia Condemns US Sending Depleted Uranium Shells to Ukraine


Controversial Depleted Uranium Ammunition Included in US Assistance Package to Kyiv

In a move that has sparked debate and raised concerns, the United States has included controversial depleted uranium ammunition as part of a new $1 billion assistance package to Kyiv. The decision has drawn criticism from environmentalists and health experts who argue that the use of such ammunition poses significant risks to both human health and the environment.

Depleted uranium ammunition, also known as DU ammunition, is a type of armor-piercing round that is made from the byproduct of uranium enrichment. It is highly effective in penetrating armored vehicles and has been used by the US military for decades. However, its use has been a subject of controversy due to the potential long-term health and environmental consequences.

One of the main concerns surrounding depleted uranium ammunition is its radioactive properties. While the level of radioactivity in DU ammunition is relatively low, there are concerns that prolonged exposure to the radioactive material can have adverse health effects. Studies have shown that inhaling or ingesting depleted uranium particles can increase the risk of developing cancer and other serious illnesses.

Furthermore, when depleted uranium ammunition strikes a target, it releases fine particles of uranium oxide dust into the air. These particles can contaminate the surrounding environment and pose a threat to both humans and wildlife. The dust can be carried by wind or water, potentially contaminating soil, water sources, and food supplies.

Opponents of the use of depleted uranium ammunition argue that its long-lasting effects can be devastating, particularly in conflict zones where it is used extensively. They point to the Gulf War in the 1990s and the conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan, where DU ammunition was heavily utilized, as examples of the potential dangers. In these areas, there have been reports of increased rates of cancer and birth defects, which some attribute to the use of DU ammunition.

Despite these concerns, proponents of depleted uranium ammunition argue that its use is necessary for military purposes. They contend that DU ammunition provides a significant advantage in combat situations, as it can penetrate heavily armored targets more effectively than conventional ammunition. They also argue that the risks associated with depleted uranium are minimal compared to the immediate threat posed by enemy forces.

The decision to include depleted uranium ammunition in the US assistance package to Kyiv has reignited the debate over its use. Critics argue that providing such ammunition to a country already embroiled in a conflict could exacerbate the health and environmental risks. They fear that the use of DU ammunition in Ukraine could lead to long-term consequences for both the Ukrainian people and the surrounding region.

However, supporters of the decision argue that providing depleted uranium ammunition to Ukraine is a strategic move aimed at bolstering the country’s defense capabilities. They argue that Ukraine, which is facing ongoing aggression from Russia, needs all available resources to defend itself. They also emphasize that the US military has used DU ammunition extensively in the past without significant adverse effects on its own troops.

As the debate continues, it is clear that the inclusion of depleted uranium ammunition in the US assistance package to Kyiv has sparked controversy and raised important questions about its use. While proponents argue for its military effectiveness, opponents highlight the potential risks to human health and the environment. As the situation unfolds, it remains to be seen how this decision will impact both Ukraine and the wider region.

Latest stories