My first car review Collections

Must Read

- Advertisement -

Gallery: Vivo X50 Pro | 16 Shots


- Advertisement -

My comparison concentrated on the meant benefits of Vivo’s micro gimbal digicam, which means in most circumstances, it is the X50 Pro’s 48-megapixel f/1.6 camera vs . the S20 Ultra’s beastly 108-megapixel f/one.eight shooter. Coincidentally, each key cameras output 12-megapixel illustrations or photos by way of pixel-binning, apart from the latter uses 3×3 combos rather of 2×2 to mimic even greater pixels for larger performance. The S20 Ultra switches to its twelve-megapixel f/2.two ultra-large camera for its “super steady” manner, which I’ll converse about as effectively later on.

For the sake of comfort, I mounted both of those phones side by aspect onto the similar handheld rig, which I utilized mostly for online video shoots and basic nevertheless pictures. For very long-exposure photographs in the darkish, I would hold the telephones 1 at a time as an alternative to guarantee greatest handheld stabilization.

Vivo X50 Pro gimbal camera

- Advertisement -

Richard Lai/Engadget

Prior to I headed out, I walked about my apartment with my makeshift rig to get familiar with it, and I also applied that opportunity to see how the cameras executed indoors with natural lighting. As I expected, the X50 Pro’s digital camera had greater movie stabilization, and as a reward, it supplied much more organic colours and superior dynamic vary. 

- Advertisement -

That stated, Vivo’s footage was way too gentle — I struggled to make out the titles on my bookshelf even when I went up close. On the other aspect of the fence, the S20 Extremely did effectively with sharpness — it could potentially even go a tiny less difficult on the sharpening, but it was absolutely greater than the X50 Pro’s, even so.

I made the same observation with the footage I acquired from going for walks underneath the great weather. The X50 Professional the moment yet again conquer the S20 Ultra with extra realistic colours but fell at the rear of in sharpness. With additional background sound present, I started off noticing that the X50 Professional experienced far better audio top quality as effectively the S20 Ultra’s footage sounded muddier and lacked information in the bigger frequencies.

Any time I picked up my tempo or built unexpected actions, the micro gimbal camera proved its really worth by keeping the video steadier than the S20 Ultra’s jumpy online video, but it could only cope with so a lot stabilization — it at some point struggled to hold up when I started off sprinting.

This is wherever the S20 Ultra’s “super steady” mode arrives in. Once you toggle this, the digicam application switches to the extremely-huge digital camera, in which it makes use of purely digital stabilization and cropping to compensate for excessive movements. In this manner, the S20 Extremely conveniently tamed the shakiness from my sprinting, with the trade-off being minimized sharpness and slight wobbling from electronic stabilization.

Two sets of powerful cameras.

Richard Lai/Engadget

The X50 Pro has a identical method dubbed “ultra steady,” but somewhat than switching to its eight-megapixel ultra-broad camera, it continues to use the main digicam but with a much more highly effective electronic stabilization (by rising the cropping angle). Regrettably, this could not cope with my sprinting, and it did not appear to make much variance in comparison to normal mode. Vivo’s solution manager admitted that this kind of a method would be a lot more helpful on an extremely-broad camera, which would deliver more headspace for cropping, but the team opted for the major camera’s better impression high quality instead.

Switching back again to typical movie method on the two phones, I was later astonished that the S20 Ultra managed to have much better stabilization than the X50 Professional when I walked down a set of stairs. This is likely due to the fact Vivo’s micro gimbal only does twin-axis stabilization, so it lacks the 3rd axis to dampen this unique motion. This just goes to clearly show how significantly we have appear with electronic stabilization. But of system, possibly someday a potential iteration of the micro gimbal will be able to go over all three axes.

I obtained to the harbor shortly soon after it went dark, and issues bought exciting. When the S20 Extremely aced the X50 Pro in terms of sharpness during the day, it was the opposite at evening. The Samsung phone utilized weighty sound reduction to its night time-time footage, so a great deal of wonderful aspects on each distant skyscrapers and nearby banners have been lacking. Distortion from Samsung’s stabilization also turned extra clear as the surrounding received darker — the total footage would shake with just about each individual stage I took.

Though the X50 Pro’s night time time footage appeared a very little darker, it very easily defeat the S20 Ultra in all other areas. Much more specifics ended up preserved, colours ended up more exact, and stabilization was improved. The cleaner audio high quality came in as a bonus to far better capture the atmosphere of the light and seem show.

I as soon as once more switched to “super steady” / “ultra stable” mode on both of those telephones to see how they would execute in the dim. All over again, the difference wasn’t clear on the X50 Pro, but at the very least the graphic excellent was comparable. The S20 Ultra’s footage, on the other hand, was severely beneath-uncovered, to the stage where most of the skyscrapers had pretty much disappeared into the dark. Such is the limitation of the slower f/2.2 extremely-extensive camera used in this method.

Vivo X50 Pro

Richard Lai/Engadget

I then shifted my aim to still pictures, in order to exam Vivo’s statements of improved small-light photographs employing the gimbal digicam. Indeed, a lot like the movies, the X50 Pro’s stills created a lot more accurate colors and preserved more aspects on the properties. The S20 Extremely tried using to make up ground by artificially sharpening its photographs, but you just cannot conserve what’s already shed.

Extended publicity is evidently also a sturdy accommodate of Vivo’s micro gimbal digicam, so I shifted to yet another place to try out some late night road images. Even with exposures of as long as .5 seconds, the X50 Professional continue to took sharper and much more normal images than the S20 Ultra in most events. The gimbal camera’s far better dynamic variety also meant billboards were being a lot less washed out in the X50 Pro’s photographs.

Gallery: Vivo X50 Pro gimbal digicam vs Samsung Galaxy S20 Extremely primary camera | eighteen Photos


- Advertisement -

Latest News

More Articles Like This