VANCOUVER, British Columbia (AP) — A lawyer for a senior government of Chinese tech large Huawei on Wednesday accused a Canadian police officer of mendacity about why he didn’t arrest her instantly at Vancouver’s airport two years in the past.Richard Peck advised Constable Winston Yep throughout cross-examination that he didn’t imagine Yep was sincere when he advised the British Columbia Supreme Court this week why the arrest occurred solely after Canada Border Services Agency officers questioned Meng for 3 hours.Yep is the primary in a collection of witnesses referred to as to testify on the request of attorneys for Huawei chief monetary officer Meng Wanzhou, who’s combating extradition to the U.S. to face fraud fees. Her authorized crew is gathering proof for arguments it can make subsequent yr that she was subjected to an abuse of course of.Meng, who’s the daughter of Huawei’s founder, was detained in December 2018 in Vancouver as she was altering flights. Washington accuses Huawei of utilizing a Hong Kong shell firm to promote tools to Iran in violation of U.S. sanctions and has charged Meng with committing fraud by deceptive the HSBC financial institution concerning the firm’s enterprise dealings in Iran.The U.S. extradition request has soured relations between Canada and China. Beijing views Meng’s case as an try and comprise China’s rise. Huawei represents China’s progress in turning into a technological energy.Yep testified that border officers advised him they’d their very own considerations about Meng’s immigration standing and he didn’t wish to infringe on their jurisdiction, so agreed that they need to display screen Meng first then he would make the arrest.Although a senior Royal Canadian Mounted Police officer recommended boarding the airplane and arresting Meng instantly after it landed, Yep advised the courtroom he didn’t know who Meng was travelling with and was involved about public and officer security.“My view is that’s not an honest answer,″ Peck told Yep. “Safety was never an issue.”“There is a risk there, because there are lots of people around there,” Yep responded. “We have to mitigate the risk as much as possible.”Story continuesYep confirmed when requested by Peck that nowhere in his notes from the time main as much as Meng’s arrest did he write down any considerations about security or jurisdiction.Meng’s attorneys have alleged there was a “coordinated strategy” to have the RCMP delay her arrest so border officers might query Meng for 3 hours underneath the pretense of a routine immigration examination.It is considered one of a number of allegations of wrongdoing that Meng’s crew is lodging towards the RCMP and Canadian border officers, together with accusations they saved deliberately poor notes and didn’t arrest her instantly in response to the warrant’s necessities.Yep testified he didn’t imagine the three hours of questioning by border officers created an unacceptable delay that went towards a stipulation within the provisional warrant for an “immediate” arrest.In obvious retaliation for Meng’s arrest, China detained former Canadian diplomat Michael Kovrig and Canadian entrepreneur Michael Spavor. China has additionally positioned restrictions on varied Canadian exports to China, together with canola oil seed and meat. China additionally handed a loss of life sentence to a convicted Canadian drug smuggler in a sudden retrial.