The political crisis in Israel has intensified in the early weeks of Benjamin Netanyahu’s far-right coalition government. Widespread protests have erupted across the country over proposed judicial reforms, while a wave of Israeli military raids has resulted in the deaths and injuries of many Palestinians. Israeli settlers have also attacked Palestinian communities under the watch of the Israeli army. The question remains: how responsible is Israel’s new government for this violence and unrest, and how is it all likely to end?
Gideon Levy, a columnist at Haaretz newspaper, believes that the new government is entirely responsible for the current situation. He argues that Netanyahu’s coalition government has been pushing for these judicial reforms to protect themselves from prosecution, and that this has led to a backlash from the public. Levy also points out that the Israeli military raids and settler attacks are a result of the government’s policies towards the Palestinians.
Sally Abed, a Palestinian activist in Israel and member of the national leadership of the peace movement Standing Together, agrees with Levy’s assessment. She believes that the new government is trying to consolidate its power by attacking the judiciary and suppressing dissent. Abed also notes that the violence against Palestinians has increased since the new government took office, and that this is a direct result of their policies.
Steven Erlanger, chief diplomatic correspondent in Europe for The New York Times and former Jerusalem bureau chief, takes a more measured approach. He acknowledges that the new government has contributed to the current crisis, but also notes that there are deeper issues at play. Erlanger argues that Israel has been moving towards a more right-wing and nationalist agenda for some time, and that this has led to a polarized society.
Despite their differing perspectives, all three guests agree that the situation in Israel is likely to get worse before it gets better. Levy believes that the protests will continue to grow in size and intensity, and that the government will respond with more repression. Abed agrees, but also notes that the Palestinian community is likely to become more radicalized in response to the violence against them. Erlanger believes that there is a possibility for a political solution, but only if both sides are willing to compromise.
The question remains: what can be done to resolve this crisis? Levy argues that the only way forward is for Netanyahu’s government to step down and for new elections to be held. Abed agrees, but also emphasizes the need for international pressure on Israel to change its policies towards the Palestinians. Erlanger believes that there needs to be a dialogue between Israelis and Palestinians, but acknowledges that this will be difficult given the current polarization.
In conclusion, the situation in Israel is complex and multifaceted. The new government’s policies have contributed to a political crisis, while violence against Palestinians has increased. The protests against judicial reforms are likely to continue, and there is a risk of further repression from the government. However, there is also a possibility for a political solution if both sides are willing to compromise. Ultimately, it will be up to Israelis and Palestinians to find a way forward together.