Gaza factions improve calls to revoke US-UNRWA settlement

Must Read

- Advertisement -

GAZA CITY, Gaza Strip — Palestinian factions in Gaza organized a convention on Sept. 14 to name for the revocation of the framework between the United States and the UN Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees within the Near East (UNRWA).

The convention, which was organized in al-Shati refugee camp, west of Gaza City, was attended by a whole bunch of residents. The Palestinian flag was raised whereas a number of banners harassed “the refugees’ rejection of the conditional funding of UNRWA and the rejection of the agreement.”

- Advertisement -

The Framework for Cooperation between the UNRWA and the US for 2021-2022 referred to as for restoring US funding to the UN company after it was reduce off for a number of years below former US President Donald Trump.

The framework, signed in July, stipulates, “The US will not make any contributions to UNRWA except on the condition that UNRWA takes all feasible measures to ensure that no part of the US contribution is used to assist any refugee receiving military training as a member of the so-called Palestinian Liberation Army or any other guerrilla organization or has participated in any terrorist act.”

- Advertisement -

Under the framework, the US paid an extra $135 million to the company.

Palestinian nationwide and Islamic events within the Gaza Strip led protests again on July 15 towards the framework. 

- Advertisement -

In April, the US authorities resumed its financing for UNRWA with $150 million. In May, the US additionally offered about $33 million in humanitarian help to UNRWA in response to the tough humanitarian situations that adopted the navy confrontation between the resistance factions in Gaza and Israel.

During his presidency (2017-2021), Trump regularly reduce off the monetary assist that had been earmarked for the Palestinians within the US price range for many years.

The US is the largest single contributor to UNRWA, paying about $300 million yearly towards the $1.2 billion price range. The company is the biggest employer within the Gaza Strip, with about 13,000 employees in a neighborhood the place half of the inhabitants is unemployed.

The Joint Refugee Committee, which incorporates the refugee committees of the Palestinian events (together with the Palestinian Liberation Organization factions, Hamas and the Islamic Jihad), defined in an announcement on Sept. 16 that the cooperation framework “imposes unacceptable conditions for the funding to proceed. Chief among these is that it links its continuation to the so-called neutrality at the level of the work, staff, and Palestinian beneficiaries of UNRWA. The framework also rids the refugee issue of its political dimension, which is based on the right of return.”

The assertion additional added that “the framework gives donors, especially the US, the right to oversee UNRWA’s overall work, allowing its performance to be judged based on the US concept and not according to international law.”

Ahmed al-Mudallal, the official liable for the refugee file within the Islamic Jihad, advised Al-Monitor, “The cooperation framework is illegal because it does not go in line with the UN agreements that preserve the rights of the Palestinian people. It is just a bilateral agreement between the US and UNRWA that aims to fund the agency to act as a security arm for the US State Department and the Israeli Foreign Ministry to monitor the national affiliations of [UNRWA] employees and refugees [in Gaza] benefiting from the agency’s services.”

He added, “The US interference in the school curricula of UNRWA schools, especially the subjects of national education, religion and geography, and hiding the map of Palestine is a blatant interference that threatens future generations and undermines the primary role of UNRWA in preserving the rights of refugees.”

UNRWA’s pledge that no Palestinian refugee receiving navy coaching would profit from the US contribution is a “serious precedent in the way a UN organization deals with refugees,” the UNRWA Department in the Democratic Front for the Liberation of Palestine said in an Aug. 21 statement. “This places economic pressure on them and impedes their struggle to regain their occupied lands with the recognition of the UN itself.”

On Sept. 2, the Higher Follow-up Committee of Palestinian factions in the Gaza Strip sent a letter of protest to UNRWA Commissioner-General Philippe Lazzarini in response to the cooperation framework.

Mohammed al-Madhoun, head of Hamas’ refugee department, told Al-Monitor that the Palestinian factions were not aware of the terms of the framework before signing it in July.

“About a month after it was signed, the framework was published on the website of the US State Department, and the factions worked on translating and discussing it in several workshops before it was rejected,” he added.

In an announcement issued on Sept. 2, Hamas stated the framework included situations that it described as “dangerous and humiliating.”

The motion introduced its rejection of any measures that will be taken towards the employees or beneficiaries of UNRWA primarily based on this framework.

Mustafa al-Sawaf, a political analyst near Hamas, believes that the cooperation framework “requires refugees to yield to US conditions, knowing that Palestinian refugees would not accept to remain mere recipients of aid, without preserving the refugee identity and the right of return, which are the foundations of UNRWA. This framework is gradually eliminating the refugee issue.”

Economic researcher Mohammed Nassar advised Al-Monitor, “There are Palestinian concerns over the cooperation framework because despite its positive aspects, its funding is subject to political conditions … .”

“What the Palestinian factions reject is the US interference in the Palestinian curriculum in UNRWA schools, which would revoke the right of return and interfere with the freedom of opinion and expression of the Palestinian refugees,” Nassar stated.

He added, “I belong to the third generation of Palestinian refugees who were displaced from the village of Barba in 1948, and the right of the refugees is an authentic right that the Palestinians are trying to preserve, and I dream of returning to my village at any time. The US agreement with UNRWA must preserve the rights of Palestinian refugees.”


- Advertisement -

Latest News

More Articles Like This