Liberal candidate Maia Sandu has been introduced because the winner of Moldova’s presidential election. But whereas she has been crucial of relations with Russia previously, her nation’s international coverage could not dramatically change. The former prime minister, who leads the Western leaning Party of Action and Solidarity, beat the incumbent president, Igor Dodon, with near 58 per cent of the vote in Sunday’s election. Dodon, who had been seen as one of many Kremlin’s closest allies within the area, attracted 42 per cent within the second-round ballot. He conceded defeat on Monday morning, saying, “If the courts confirm everything is OK, then we will put a full stop here.” There had beforehand been fears of unrest after the end result was introduced.Foreign coverage was a key differentiator between the candidates throughout the marketing campaign, with Sandu, a Harvard-educated former World Bank economist, claiming Dodon’s presidency had seen “relations with the EU and US go from bad to worse.” This was as a result of “Dodon has been trying to establish good relations only with Russia, but even with Russia, he has been using this for his personal interests, not to solve the country’s problems,” she stated. Read extra However, some Russian consultants have been fast to reject the concept that Sandu’s victory will imply a big change in Moldova’s approach to its allies. Andrey Suzdaltsev, Deputy Dean of the International Affairs Faculty at Moscow’s prestigious Higher School of Economics, informed the RIA Novosti information company that the Kremlin shouldn’t “be upset about Sandu’s victory in the elections. She is a very practical person and will try to preserve and develop the achievements that Chișinău and Moscow already have.”He added that “the situation in Moldova is now more or less stable – her political grouping has learned hard lessons from the crises that previously split the country. I think they have [a desire to] preserve stability and a good attitude towards Russia.”Speaking to RT, Fyodor Lukyanov, Editor-in-chief of the journal Russia in Global Affairs, stated that “nothing will change fundamentally in Moldova,” however that it’s “positive that power will change hands calmly and in a civilized way.”“But, in general,” he added, “the fate of the country is unenviable when the decisive word belongs to those who have left and are unlikely to return.” Voters from Moldova’s diaspora, voting by absentee poll, overwhelmingly supported Sandu within the first spherical, giving her round 70 per cent of the abroad vote. For them, Lukyanov defined, “the choice between East and West is literal – where they choose to go and live and earn money.”For Lukyanov, the outlook for Moldova’s relations with the European Union is way from vibrant. He argued that the so-called “giants” that dominate international coverage spheres are “now so absorbed in their own problems that they are much less concerned with peripheral countries and disputes over influence there.”Not all analysts share that view, with Sergey Markov of the Institute of Political Studies saying on Monday that Sandu is “the political enemy of Russia.” He claimed that, as minister of schooling, she “spoke in favor of replacing the Russian language with as much English as possible. [And] she always criticized Russia at the earliest opportunity.” Markov additionally claimed that Sandu helps the “acquisition of Moldova by Romania.” Also on rt.com Autumn of discontent? Moldova is subsequent US goal for ‘color revolution’, Russia’s chief spy warns forward of presidential election The two candidates have been as soon as coalition companions, after Sandu’s Party of Action and Solidarity agreed to control with the Socialist Party, which helps Dodon. However, rows over corruption and home coverage introduced the delicate settlement to an finish in November final 12 months. Since then, Moldova has struggled with an ailing economic system and the influence of the coronavirus pandemic.Russian President Vladimir Putin congratulated Sandu on her victory on Monday morning. He wrote that he trusted her “activity as head of state will contribute to the constructive development of relations between our countries.” He added that “This would undoubtedly serve the fundamental interests of the peoples of Russia and Moldova.”If you want this story, share it with a buddy!