Charlotte Kirk wish to set the report straight.The actress on the heart of two Hollywood intercourse scandals has already spoken out as soon as, claiming within the spring of 2019 that she had a consensual affair with Warner Bros. CEO Kevin Tsujihara.But now Kirk desires to talk out once more, this time to inform what she says is the true story — the one she was paid thousands and thousands to cowl up. The catch is that she has been forbidden from doing so, first by an arbitrator after which by a Los Angeles Superior Court choose.Kirk’s firsthand account has however turn into a part of the general public report. In two sworn declarations filed in court docket final week, Kirk laid out a narrative of sexual misconduct on the higher echelons of Hollywood. She additionally mentioned that she had suffered emotional anguish and the overall destruction of her profession.“I am a pariah in the film industry, humiliated and unemployable,” she wrote.Nothing involving Charlotte Kirk is kind of that straightforward, nonetheless. On the opposite facet of the ledger, she has been accused of extorting funds from a sequence of Hollywood energy gamers.She has been paid no less than $Three million for her silence, in line with court docket data. She additionally used her allegations to safe financing for her boyfriend’s movie, “Nicole and O.J.,” during which she would star. She is now engaged to a different director, Neil Marshall, who additionally solid her in a lead function, and who, in line with an arbitrator’s ruling, additionally sought funds for his silence.Kirk now alleges that she was unwittingly groomed at a younger age into taking part in “commercial sex.” According to her personal account, she anticipated to be rewarded for varied sexual acts with appearing jobs. When these guarantees fell via, she employed a lawyer and obtained a settlement settlement that made the transaction express: in trade for remaining silent about her sexual claims, she was to be solid in a sequence of movies.Those guarantees, she alleges, had been additionally false. She was by no means solid within the promised roles. According to an arbitrator’s ruling, she has since sought extra funds.Ron Meyer, who would later lose his job as NBCUniversal vice chairman over his liaison with Kirk, exploded in frustration when her attorneys initiated a declare towards him in 2019, in line with a draft grievance filed by Kirk’s former boyfriend in L.A. Superior Court.“That f—ing c—,” Meyer mentioned, in line with the submitting. “I did nothing wrong. All I did was f— her a couple of times. I did nothing wrong. That c—. I’ll take her down.”A Meyer spokesman disputed that he made that assertion.Marty Singer, the legal professional who represents a number of gamers within the scandal, referred to as Kirk’s newest accusations a part of “a multi-million-dollar civil extortion plot.”Kirk grew up within the United Kingdom and got here to the U.S. on the age of 19 to pursue an appearing profession. In March 2012, she was launched to Avi Lerner, the pinnacle of Millennium Films. According to Kirk’s declaration, Lerner invited her to his home, the place she carried out oral intercourse on him. Kirk alleges that she was coerced, and that Lerner promised her film roles in trade.“This was followed by additional instances of sexual abuse of me by him,” Kirk alleges.Throughout her account, Kirk makes repeated reference to her Asperger’s analysis, which she contends made her weak to being abused.“It makes me socially awkward, overly trusting, and easy to manipulate,” she wrote.She contends that she was positioned in the identical place as many different younger actresses — compelled both to reject sexual advances and endure hurt to her profession, or to acquiesce and threat phrase of that getting round.“At the time I couldn’t see any way out of this situation other than to comply with their demands, and my autism made it impossible for me to understand what was being done to me,” she wrote.In June 2012, Kirk says she met producer Brett Ratner. According to a requirement letter that Kirk’s lawyer despatched to Ratner’s lawyer in 2017, Kirk alleges that he additionally used the promise of movie roles to coerce her into having oral intercourse.Her 2020 declaration offers a special account, nonetheless. In the declaration, she writes that “from the very start I wanted to keep our friendship purely platonic,” as a result of she didn’t wish to turn into one in every of Ratner’s “conquests.” The identical declaration, nonetheless, affirms that all the pieces within the 2017 demand letter was true.In any case, Ratner later launched Kirk to his enterprise associate, James Packer, who, in line with the demand letter “had a series of sexual intercourses with her, while promising to make her a star and getting her placed in a blockbuster film.”In her latest declaration, Kirk mentioned that she “fell in love with James and we began what I thought was a year-long romantic relationship.”In hindsight, although, she alleged that she has come to understand that Packer “was just using me as a sex toy for his own selfish pleasure.”Packer, in flip, launched her to Tsujihara, in line with her declaration. In September 2013, Packer despatched her a sequence of texts urging her to return to the Bel Air Hotel. According to her declaration, Packer pressured her to enter a bed room the place Tsujihara was ready to have intercourse along with her. She alleges that she didn’t wish to, however feared that if she didn’t, she could be blacklisted.“I returned to the bedroom and let Mr. Tsujihara have his way with me,” she wrote. “It lasted 20 minutes although it felt like hours.”Like the others, the connection continued. Kirk alleges that Tsujihara continued to carry out the prospect of appearing roles, whereas she had intercourse with him over the subsequent a number of weeks.“However, except for one more small acting role, he never came through on his promises to help my career,” she wrote.Tsujihara has mentioned, via attorneys, that Kirk pursued him, that the intercourse was consensual, that he didn’t safe appearing roles for her, and that her claims on the contrary are fabrications supposed to “unjustly seek the payment of money.”The Hollywood Reporter first broke the story in March 2019, counting on a trove of leaked textual content messages to reveal what gave the impression to be a consensual relationship between Tsujihara and Kirk. Tsujihara was compelled to resign 12 days later.In an interview with the British tabloid The Sun in March 2019, Kirk mentioned she was not claiming to be a #MeToo sufferer.“That would cheapen all the men and women who have genuinely been exploited,” Kirk mentioned. “I had a relationship with Kevin because I wanted to.”She informed the Daily Mail the identical factor two weeks later.“I wasn’t forced into anything and I did what I wanted to do — good or bad,” she mentioned. “I would make completely different choices now and I regret doing that.”Kirk now says that she was certainly a #MeToo sufferer, and that her denials within the spring of 2019 had been coerced out of her by Singer, the legal professional who represents Ratner, Packer and Lerner.“Those statements bear no relationship to what really happened to me,” she wrote in a declaration.Kirk had agreed in August 2017 to a $3.Three million settlement with Ratner, Packer, Lerner and Tsujihara, in line with a replica of the settlement filed in court docket final week. Kirk was additionally to be solid in three movies, or paid $500,000 for every function that didn’t come via. She alleges that the producers reneged on the deal and nonetheless owe her $1.eight million. Under the settlement, one other $1 million went to finance the manufacturing of a portion of “Nicole and O.J.,” directed by Kirk’s then-boyfriend, Joshua Newton.An amended settlement, in December 2017, offered one other $2.5 million for the movie, which stays unfinished. The deal included elaborate confidentiality provisions, and the modification added an announcement that Kirk was to launch if her allegations ever grew to become public. The assertion affirmed that her relationship with Tsujihara was consensual, and that she had no claims towards Ratner or Packer. That assertion, with a couple of edits, was offered to the Hollywood Reporter for its story in March 2019.Kirk was represented by attorneys within the settlement, however she now alleges that she was fraudulently induced to signal the agreements.Kirk’s attorneys negotiated a separate take care of Meyer, following her 2019 declare towards him. Kirk was to obtain $2.5 million, of which she has acquired $500,000 thus far.She is now looking for to rescind the 2017 settlements in a bid to “finally put it behind me and move on with my life.”“I was easily manipulated by false promises of career help by powerful men in the entertainment industry, that were in fact just a pretext for obtaining sexual favors from me, because I was too insecure, hopelessly naive, and far too young to know that this was not how the business is meant to work,” she wrote. “It has never been my desire to extort money from these people, only to get what I believe I’m owed for the financial damage, career damage, and emotional distress and suffering they’ve caused me.”More from VarietyBetter of VarietyJoin Variety’s Newsletter. For the newest information, comply with us on Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram.