Boohoo: MPs demand solutions over Boohoo exploitation claims

Must Read

- Advertisement -

Image copyright Boohoo Online retailer Boohoo has been criticised by MPs who say it has failed to deal with claims of exploitation at factories in Leicester.Philip Dunne MP mentioned he discovered it “incredible” Boohoo was stunned by allegations of poor working situations.Boohoo had mentioned it was “shocked and appalled” by stories that staff had been paid as little as £3.50 per hour.But Mr Dunne advised the agency was already conscious of the problems. Boohoo mentioned it might reply “in due course”.The agency’s co-founder, and then-chief govt, Carol Kane appeared in entrance of the Environmental Audit Committee (EAC) of MPs in 2018 over hyperlinks Boohoo “may have to illegally low pay in Leicester garment factories”. “It is incredible that over a year since the committee highlighted illegal working practices in its supply chain, Boohoo has publicly denied any knowledge of what has been happening for years,” Mr Dunne, who’s chair of the EAC, wrote in a letter to the corporate.”It is shameful that it took a pandemic and the ensuing outrage about working practices in their supply chain for Boohoo finally to be taken to task for turning a blind eye,” he mentioned.’Turning a blind eye’Last week, Boohoo – which additionally owns the Pretty Little Thing model – confronted a backlash after a report claimed staff at a Leicester manufacturing facility that provided garments to Boohoo had been paid simply £3.50 an hour, whereas being supplied no safety from coronavirus.The nationwide minimal wage for folks over 25 years-old is £8.72 an hour. Image copyright Prettylittlething Image caption Boohoo additionally owns PrettyLittleThing, which has collaborated with celebrities like Little Mix The style agency ordered an impartial assessment of its UK provide chain because of this, which can by led by Alison Levitt QC, a barrister specialising in enterprise crime and monetary companies. The committee additionally requested what measures the net retailer had taken to guard the employees that make its garments throughout the pandemic, and whether or not it might enable the institution of formal commerce unions. The letter cited claims by Usdaw that staff had been advised “not to speak with trade union representatives”.
Boohoo motion on exploitation claims ‘insufficient’
Boohoo dropped by Next, Asos and Zalando over exploitation claims
Other style shops have distanced themselves from Boohoo over the current stories.Next, Asos and Zalando all introduced that that they had stopped promoting Boohoo garments on their web sites in July.The retailers mentioned they had been pausing relationships with Boohoo’s manufacturers, pending the end result of the corporate’s investigation.Boohoo’s share worth has plunged over the previous month. It at present stands at 210p, after hovering across the 410p mark for many of June.

- Advertisement -

Latest News

More Articles Like This